S00-001: Define the Web scope passport and native exclusion boundaries

Changes: Add proposed scope ADR with reasons for all ten excluded IDs, retained Web obligations, lifecycle limits, external provider roles and deferred decisions. Add a document coverage/lifecycle checker with four negative mutations and executor evidence/handoff for security review.
Validation: python3 experiments/0000-scope/check.py passed for ten excluded IDs and seven lifecycle scenarios; all four negative mutations were rejected. make check passed validation and 66 tooling tests. Whitespace and allowed source paths checked. No live browser or provider integration was tested; ADR awaits independent review.

Task: S00-001
Agent: auto-orchestrator-48aab142ecde
Role: orchestrator
Action: claim
Status: review

Task title: Утвердить Web-профиль

state/handoffs/S00-001.md

@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
+# S00-001 handoff
+
+Executor: auto-orchestrator-48aab142ecde, orchestrator
+Outcome: proposed Web-scope passport in `docs/decisions/0000-scope.md`; complete ten-ID native exclusion table and provider inventory. No blocker. No dependencies or previous handoff.
+
+Ready for independent security reviewer. Read the ADR, canonical applicability, GEN-005/006 and WEB-002, then run `python3 experiments/0000-scope/check.py`. Check the NET-002 retained Web clause, conditional push registration, closed-tab/media restrictions, logout/revoke and provider secret/metadata boundaries. Verify executor message against actual diff and evidence. Coordinator owns commit and next fresh process; executor does not set done.
+
+Checks passed: focused document experiment (10 excluded IDs, 7 scenarios, 4 rejected negative mutations), `make check` (validate + 66 tooling tests), whitespace/scope inspection. Evidence: `state/evidence/S00-001-auto-orchestrator-48aab142ecde.md`.
+
+Limits: no browser/provider runtime test; no chosen framework/library/browser versions, persistent unlock model or deployed topology. These remain S00-002…010 decisions, not missing implementation in S00-001. ADR status is proposed; reviewer should explicitly record acceptance or rejection through assigned workflow. Shared contracts/specs/plan definitions were not changed.