Files
LumaWeb/state/evidence/S00-016-auto-ci-cd-351a0cbbabef.md
T
wt 83404f9c8a S00-016: Record recovered fresh reviewer execution path
Changes: Document coordinator-authorized external readiness and successful post-release tool use through the shared reviewer/executor harness; add S00-016 evidence and handoff. No source or harness configuration changes.
Validation: Read-only readiness assertions passed with exit 0; tasks.py validate passed for 281 tasks at revision 29; git diff --check passed. Parent tasks remain blocked and unaccepted. Future provider capacity and S00-012 acceptance require separate fresh review.

Task: S00-016
Agent: auto-ci-cd-351a0cbbabef
Role: ci-cd
Action: claim
Status: review

Task title: Restore reviewer model availability after provider capacity failure
2026-10-15 01:56:00 +07:00

4.8 KiB

S00-016 execution-path readiness evidence

Executor: auto-ci-cd-351a0cbbabef; role: ci-cd; date: 2026-10-15. Result: observed available fresh tool-capable shared reviewer execution path; pending independent QA review.

Input, output and acceptance

Input: task/card/packet, required startup and task documents, blocker reports, direct dependency executor/review evidence, accepted scope ADR, coordinator external-release event, local command configuration and actual run records. Output: this bounded readiness record. No source modification or provider/model configuration change was needed.

The coordinator explicitly supplied readiness in state/tasks.json events, revision 28, at 2026-10-14T18:54:03+00:00, action release-external for S00-016, agent coordinator-capacity-b12fb7abdd2d. Its reason authorizes autonomous recovery, cites successful tools in auto-ci-cd-5475930af078, and requires fresh resolver/QA verification without parent acceptance. Revision 29 assigned this fresh resolver at 18:54:04+00:00, after release.

Actual startup observation

Failed reviewer auto-qa-98b05bd56c25: run.json returncode 1, stopped_after_transition false; output.log reports WebSocket fallback after HTTP 503 Service Unavailable and twice Selected model is at capacity. No acceptance review completed.

runner.local.json commands_by_role is empty. Its common command is /Users/tola/.local/bin/codex --ask-for-approval never exec --sandbox workspace-write --config sandbox_workspace_write.network_access=true --cd {root} -. There is no resume argument or role-specific model override. scripts/runner.py launch opens the persisted prompt as stdin, starts a subprocess with a fresh agent id and supplies assignment environment variables. No new agent was launched by this executor.

Startup headers in state/runs//output.log show the same Codex v0.162.1, model gpt-6.1-sol and provider openai, with distinct sessions:

  • Failed QA: 01a13bc0-cb80-7cd0-b12d-96aed1570d6f.
  • Recovery diagnosis executor: 01a13bc1-213f-75c3-b657-6acc80b916a6.
  • Current post-release resolver: 01a13bc3-b66a-7262-9d15-b2ffa7a65db4.

Current state/runs/auto-ci-cd-351a0cbbabef/run.json records running, started_at 2026-10-14T18:54:04+00:00. This fresh model session successfully issued and consumed real shell/Python tool calls, including task resume/show/packet, readiness inspection and task validation. This is an actual startup success through the configured common reviewer/executor path after release, not a simulated model check. The current process has not yet exited; runner records its terminal returncode after submit. A later QA startup remains independently observed by its own process; this result does not guarantee future capacity.

Commands and results

  • python3 scripts/tasks.py resume --agent auto-ci-cd-351a0cbbabef: exit 0, assigned S00-016 in_progress.
  • python3 scripts/tasks.py show S00-016 and packet S00-016 --agent auto-ci-cd-351a0cbbabef: exit 0 each, bounded acceptance and required reads inspected.
  • Python read-only inspection of state/tasks.json release/claim events, runner.local.json common argv/empty role overrides, three run headers and assignment environment: exit 0. Only named nonsecret assignment variables were read; no credentials recorded.
  • Python assertion probe: exit 0. Asserted empty commands_by_role, no resume in argv, explicit coordinator release, current LUMA_AGENT_ID, same model/provider in three headers, three distinct session ids, original 503/capacity text, S00-012 and S00-015 still blocked, and current S00-016 ownership. Output: PASS: explicit external release; shared reviewer/executor command; three distinct same-model sessions; current fresh session executed this Python tool; parent reviews remain blocked.
  • python3 scripts/tasks.py validate: exit 0, 281 tasks, 22 stages, 221 requirements, 211 allocated Web requirements, revision 29.
  • git diff --check before evidence creation: exit 0.
  • Initial combined card/handoff read: exit 1 solely because S00-016 had no previous handoff. This is its first executor attempt; packet also contains no previous handoff. All explicitly required task artifacts exist and were read.

Scope and limits

Only evidence, handoff and commit-message metadata authored. No runner/test source edits, dependencies, secrets, spec snapshots, shared contracts, Git mutations or harness retries. No new tests were added or existing test suites rerun for this evidence-only provider recovery. Foundation validation is not application readiness. The verified condition is startup and tool use on the common reviewer execution path; this executor is not acting as the S00-012 reviewer. S00-012 and S00-015 remain blocked pending the normal remediation reviews. S00-002 is not accepted. Independent QA must verify this readiness record and its own fresh startup, then decide only S00-016.