Simplify get_bearer_token_auth and table-drive its test

Drop the now-redundant has_header guard (get_header_value already
returns "" for a missing header, which the length check rejects),
name the "Bearer " prefix once, and cite RFC 9110 to match the
file's convention. Convert the regression test to the table-driven
form used elsewhere in test.cc and move it out of the middle of
GetHeaderValueTest so that suite stays contiguous.

test/test.cc

@@ -1560,34 +1560,6 @@ TEST(GetHeaderValueTest, RegularInvalidValueInt) {
   EXPECT_TRUE(is_invalid_value);
 }
 
-TEST(BearerTokenAuthTest, SchemeValidation) {
-  // A value shorter than "Bearer " must not throw from the fixed-length
-  // substr, and a non-Bearer scheme must not be reported as a token.
-  {
-    Request req;
-    req.set_header("Authorization", "x");
-    EXPECT_EQ("", get_bearer_token_auth(req));
-  }
-  {
-    Request req;
-    req.set_header("Authorization", "Basic QWxhZGRpbjpvcGVuIHNlc2FtZQ==");
-    EXPECT_EQ("", get_bearer_token_auth(req));
-  }
-
-  // A well-formed header still yields the token; the scheme is
-  // case-insensitive.
-  {
-    Request req;
-    req.set_header("Authorization", "Bearer abc123");
-    EXPECT_EQ("abc123", get_bearer_token_auth(req));
-  }
-  {
-    Request req;
-    req.set_header("Authorization", "bearer abc123");
-    EXPECT_EQ("abc123", get_bearer_token_auth(req));
-  }
-}
-
 TEST(GetHeaderValueTest, OutOfRangeValueInt) {
   // An all-digit value that overflows size_t must be reported as invalid, not
   // silently saturated/truncated: parsing at size_t width would otherwise wrap
@@ -1646,6 +1618,26 @@ TEST(GetHeaderValueTest, Range) {
   }
 }
 
+TEST(BearerTokenAuthTest, SchemeValidation) {
+  // A value shorter than "Bearer " must not throw from the fixed-length
+  // substr, and a non-Bearer scheme must not be reported as a token.
+  struct {
+    const char *value;
+    const char *expected;
+  } cases[] = {
+      {"x", ""},
+      {"Basic QWxhZGRpbjpvcGVuIHNlc2FtZQ==", ""},
+      {"Bearer abc123", "abc123"},
+      {"bearer abc123", "abc123"}, // scheme match is case-insensitive
+  };
+
+  for (const auto &c : cases) {
+    Request req;
+    req.set_header("Authorization", c.value);
+    EXPECT_EQ(c.expected, get_bearer_token_auth(req)) << "value: " << c.value;
+  }
+}
+
 TEST(HeadersOrderTest, DuplicateFieldsKeepInsertionOrder) {
   // RFC 9110 5.3: the order of fields sharing a name is significant. This used
   // to depend on the standard library (libstdc++ handed back duplicates in