yhirose 6b8c3f5387 Report only a caller-set WebSocket read timeout as Timeout ...

199d7ee made read() return the new ReadResult::Timeout for every read
timeout and leave the connection open. The compile-time server default
(CPPHTTPLIB_WEBSOCKET_SERVER_READ_TIMEOUT_SECOND, 300s) is always in
effect, so a handler written as `while (ws.read(msg))`, the form the
README's Quick Start uses, no longer ended when a peer went quiet:
Timeout is non-zero, so the loop ran its body again with the previous
message still in `msg`, and the worker the backstop is meant to reclaim
was never released. Nothing caught it because every test of the new
result set a timeout explicitly and checked the result by value, and the
heartbeat tests keep the connection alive with pings.

The two timeouts mean different things. One the caller sets through
set_read_timeout() is a request for control back, and is reported as
Timeout on a still-open connection. The compile-time default is a
backstop against a peer that has gone quiet, and elapsing it is now a
failure again: read() returns Fail and closes the connection, as it did
before 199d7ee. WebSocket tracks whether set_read_timeout() was called,
and WebSocketClient carries the same flag over to the WebSocket it
creates on connect().

Tests use the heartbeat binary, which compiles both defaults down to 3s:
a `while (ws.read(msg))` server handler runs its body once and exits
when the client falls silent, and a client that never set a timeout gets
Fail with the connection closed. The README and cookbook now say which
timeout produces Timeout.

Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01EF5uZ1X2kaHhqJ8VgfjVaQ

2026-09-11 17:29:20 -04:00

..

pages

Report only a caller-set WebSocket read timeout as Timeout

2026-09-11 17:29:20 -04:00

config.toml

Release v0.55.0

2026-09-11 16:54:08 -04:00