use it to retrieve a specific subfeature by type. While it is slighly
less efficient than looping over sensors_get_all_subfeatures(), it
often makes the application code much more elegant.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4846 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
chip in the detected chip list. It is more efficient to do it once
and for all than to do it over and over again in
sensors_lookup_feature_nr() and sensors_lookup_subfeature_nr() as
was done before.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4843 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
for faster main features lookup. One side effect of this change is
that subfeatures can no longer have labels nor be ignored. I do not
think that this is a problem in practice, and actually this makes a
lot of sense.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4834 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
get the list of all main features, and one to get the list of all the
subfeatures of a given main feature. This is a more logical interface for
applications to use. The current implementation is admittedly less than
optimal, because the storage structures weren't meant for it, but this
issue can (and will) be addressed later.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4831 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
standard sysfs interface. I don't think it makes much sense to
display the offset values as part of the output of "sensors" (it
would even probably confuse people) but having support for these
in libsensors makes it possible to adjust the offsets in
sensors.conf, which is convenient.
This closes ticket #2248.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4769 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
position N in the array. This allows for O(1) look-ups, as opposed
to O(N) before. This makes sensors_lookup_feature_nr() 2.4 times
faster in my real-world tests, resulting in a 6% performance boost
on average in the runtime part of "sensors".
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4759 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
feature number as the logical mapping. This means that the compute
mapping can be turned into a simple boolean flag. Doing so makes
struct sensors_feature_data smaller, which saves some memory (about
17 kB in my tests.)
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4758 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
caller select which subset of chips it wants. This is slightly better
size-wise than letting all applications do the filtering by themselves.
This will change the way the command line parameters of "sensors" are
interpreted. Beforehand, the chips were always returned in the order
in which they were listed by the library. Also, each chip could be listed
only once. From now on, the chips will be listed in the order in which
they are passed on the command line, which I think makes more sense. A
side effect is that chips can be listed more than once, if that's what
the user asks for. Not very useful though.
This change makes it possible to make sensors_match_chip() internal
to the library. Filtering the list of chips returned by
sensors_get_detected_chips() was the last known external use for this
function.
This patch looks much bigger than it really is, but the largest part is
really only code reindentation.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4701 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
SPI bus statements in the configuration file are not yet supported, as
SPI buses don't have a name attribute yet, it's not possible to identify
them and thus no substitution is possible.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4689 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
i2c-centric. Make it more neutral so that we can cleanly support
additional bus types such as SPI or One-Wire.
This second part updates sensors_bus to use sensors_bus_id. Thanks
to Mark M. Hoffman for showing me how the configuration file
parser could be modified to support that change.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4687 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
i2c-centric. Make it more neutral so that we can cleanly support
additional bus types such as SPI or One-Wire.
This first part introduces sensors_bus_id, and updates
sensors_chip_name to use it.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4686 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
sensors_parse_chip_name(). sensors_snprintf_chip_name() converts
a chip name from its internal representation to a human readable
string. So far, each user program had to reimplement this function.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4676 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
its prototype to suit our needs better.
* Pass the chip name by address.
* Pass the feature directly rather than its number.
* Switch to a sane convention for the returned value.
* Don't check for errors that can't happen.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4646 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
delegating the task to the user applications.
For now, I am calling sensors_get_ignored() in
sensors_get_all_features(), because this is the least intrusive way.
This is in no way optimal though, it would be better to not add
ignored features to the feature list in the first place. However,
doing so would require that the configuration file is read before
sysfs is scanned for features, which isn't currently the case. So
this improvement is left for later.
Note that this patch adds a small cost in terms of performance. This
is because we now honor ignore statements on all features (main ones
and subfeatures) while in practice "sensors" was only checking for
main features. It would be trivial to stop checking for subfeatures,
but it seems to me that supporting ignore on subfeatures is a good
move, as the user may actually want to ignore a specific subfeature.
Individual alarms come to mind. This will also be handy to debug the
generic print code in "sensors".
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4644 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
immediately follow their main feature. This makes it possible to simplify
sensors_get_all_features() quite a bit. We no longer need to maintain
separate pointers for the last main feature and the last subfeature,
we can simply walk the list linearly.
Note that I am still not entirely happy with this API. It was obviously
designed for debugging purposes (sensors -u) and without performance
concernes nor interface cleanliness in mind. I believe that we want to
tag main features and subfeatures as such, and let the application ask
specifically for the list of main features, and for each feature, for
its list of subfeatures (i.e. two functions instead of one.)
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/branches/lm-sensors-3.0.0@4643 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
Jean Delvare