mirror of
https://github.com/yhirose/cpp-httplib.git
synced 2026-09-30 12:42:26 +07:00
Reject CR/LF in the request target and fail the request cleanly (#2501)
* reject crlf in request target in write_request_line * declare write_request_line in test.cc for split builds split.py strips `inline` and moves the definition into httplib.cc, so detail::write_request_line is not visible from the split httplib.h and test_split failed to compile. Re-declare it in test.cc, matching what the base64_encode and getaddrinfo_with_timeout tests already do. * Fail the request when write_request_line rejects the target The CR/LF guard in write_request_line returns -1, but ClientImpl::write_request ignored that return value. A rejected target therefore produced a request-line- less request (headers only) that the client silently reported as a successful send. This is the primary path reachable via a decoded redirect Location under set_path_encode(false), and it also carries the CONNECT target. Check the return value like ClientImpl::open_stream already does and fail with Error::Write. Add an end-to-end test asserting the client refuses a CR/LF target instead of putting it on the wire. --------- Co-authored-by: Sayed Kaif <metsw24@gmail.com>
This commit is contained in:
@@ -7542,6 +7542,13 @@ bool read_content(Stream &strm, T &x, size_t payload_max_length, int &status,
|
||||
|
||||
inline ssize_t write_request_line(Stream &strm, const std::string &method,
|
||||
const std::string &path) {
|
||||
// A request target must not carry CR/LF (or other control octets); otherwise
|
||||
// a value smuggled into it splits the request line and injects headers or a
|
||||
// whole request. The same field-value check already guards header values in
|
||||
// check_and_write_headers and the request target in
|
||||
// perform_websocket_handshake; apply it here too.
|
||||
if (!fields::is_field_value(path)) { return -1; }
|
||||
|
||||
std::string s = method;
|
||||
s += ' ';
|
||||
s += path;
|
||||
@@ -13849,7 +13856,14 @@ inline bool ClientImpl::write_request(Stream &strm, Request &req,
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Write request line and headers
|
||||
detail::write_request_line(bstrm, req.method, path_with_query);
|
||||
if (detail::write_request_line(bstrm, req.method, path_with_query) < 0) {
|
||||
// A rejected target (e.g. CR/LF smuggled in via a decoded redirect
|
||||
// Location under set_path_encode(false)) must fail the request cleanly
|
||||
// instead of emitting a request-line-less, header-injecting request.
|
||||
error = Error::Write;
|
||||
output_error_log(error, &req);
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!detail::check_and_write_headers(bstrm, req.headers, header_writer_,
|
||||
error)) {
|
||||
output_error_log(error, &req);
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7938,6 +7938,80 @@ TEST(ServerResponseSplittingTest, ChunkedTrailerCRLFInjection) {
|
||||
EXPECT_NE(std::string::npos, res.find("X-Safe: safe"));
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Forward declaration: in split builds split.py strips `inline` and moves the
|
||||
// definition into httplib.cc, so detail::write_request_line is not visible from
|
||||
// the public httplib.h. Re-declaring it here lets the tests link against the
|
||||
// symbol in both header-only and split builds.
|
||||
namespace httplib {
|
||||
namespace detail {
|
||||
ssize_t write_request_line(Stream &strm, const std::string &method,
|
||||
const std::string &path);
|
||||
} // namespace detail
|
||||
} // namespace httplib
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(RequestLineInjectionTest, RejectsCRLFInTarget) {
|
||||
// A well-formed target is written verbatim.
|
||||
{
|
||||
detail::BufferStream strm;
|
||||
auto n = detail::write_request_line(strm, "GET", "/path?a=b");
|
||||
EXPECT_GT(n, 0);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ("GET /path?a=b HTTP/1.1\r\n", strm.get_buffer());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// A target carrying CR/LF must be rejected before anything reaches the wire,
|
||||
// otherwise it splits the request line and injects a header or a whole
|
||||
// request. This is what a decoded redirect Location ("%0D%0A") turns into
|
||||
// when path encoding is disabled.
|
||||
const std::string evil_targets[] = {
|
||||
"/a\r\nInjected: pwned",
|
||||
"/a\rInjected",
|
||||
"/a\nInjected",
|
||||
"/a\r\n\r\nGET /evil HTTP/1.1\r\nHost: victim\r\n\r\n",
|
||||
};
|
||||
for (const auto &evil : evil_targets) {
|
||||
detail::BufferStream strm;
|
||||
auto n = detail::write_request_line(strm, "GET", evil);
|
||||
EXPECT_LT(n, 0);
|
||||
EXPECT_TRUE(strm.get_buffer().empty());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
TEST(RequestLineInjectionTest, ClientRejectsCRLFTargetEndToEnd) {
|
||||
// End-to-end counterpart to RejectsCRLFInTarget. With path encoding disabled
|
||||
// the client transmits the target verbatim, so a CR/LF-bearing target -- what
|
||||
// a redirect Location "%0D%0A" decodes to -- reaches write_request. The
|
||||
// client must fail cleanly with Error::Write instead of putting a
|
||||
// request-line-less, header-injecting request on the wire.
|
||||
Server svr;
|
||||
|
||||
svr.Get("/a", [](const Request &, Response &res) {
|
||||
res.set_content("ok", "text/plain");
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
auto thread = std::thread([&]() { svr.listen(HOST, PORT); });
|
||||
auto se = detail::scope_exit([&] {
|
||||
svr.stop();
|
||||
thread.join();
|
||||
ASSERT_FALSE(svr.is_running());
|
||||
});
|
||||
|
||||
svr.wait_until_ready();
|
||||
|
||||
{
|
||||
Client cli(HOST, PORT);
|
||||
cli.set_path_encode(false);
|
||||
// The request is rejected before anything is written, so the connection
|
||||
// stays silent and the subsequent response read would otherwise block for
|
||||
// the full default read timeout. Shorten it -- the assertion is on the
|
||||
// error, not the timeout.
|
||||
cli.set_read_timeout(1, 0);
|
||||
|
||||
auto res = cli.Get("/a\r\nInjected: pwned");
|
||||
EXPECT_FALSE(res);
|
||||
EXPECT_EQ(Error::Write, res.error());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// Sends a raw request and verifies that there isn't a crash or exception.
|
||||
static void test_raw_request(const std::string &req,
|
||||
std::string *out = nullptr) {
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user