Addition to the "-5V and -12V readings are way out of range!"

subsection.


git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk@3023 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
This commit is contained in:
Jean Delvare committed 2005-06-16 18:35:51 +00:00
1 parent 445d480ea0
commit 0d1c2be9f7
3 files changed
+15

No files matched your search

+5
View File
@@ -685,6 +685,11 @@ motherboard manufacturers don't think they're worth monitoring (they
are mostly unused these days). You can just add `ignore inN' lines to
`/etc/sensors.conf' to hide them.
Another possibility is that these lines are used to monitor different
voltages. Only the motherboard manufacturer can tell for sure. Taking a
look at what voltage values the BIOS displays may provide valuable
hints though.
4.7 What are VID lines? Why is the VID reading wrong?
=====================================================
+5
View File
@@ -1033,6 +1033,11 @@ motherboard manufacturers don't think they're worth monitoring
(they are mostly unused these days). You can just add
<span class="command">ignore inN</span> lines to <span class="file">/etc/sensors.conf</span> to hide them.
<p>Another possibility is that these lines are used to monitor different
voltages. Only the motherboard manufacturer can tell for sure. Taking
a look at what voltage values the BIOS displays may provide valuable
hints though.
<div class="node">
<p><hr>
<a name="Section-4_002e7"></a>Next:&nbsp;<a rel="next" accesskey="n" href="#Section-4_002e8">Section 4.8</a>,
+5
View File
@@ -700,6 +700,11 @@ motherboard manufacturers don't think they're worth monitoring
(they are mostly unused these days). You can just add
@command{ignore inN} lines to @file{/etc/sensors.conf} to hide them.
Another possibility is that these lines are used to monitor different
voltages. Only the motherboard manufacturer can tell for sure. Taking
a look at what voltage values the BIOS displays may provide valuable
hints though.
@node Section 4.7, Section 4.8, Section 4.6, Problems
@section What are VID lines? Why is the VID reading wrong?