(+5V) scaling
> I have been hunting down an issue related to the IN10 input of the
> LM93. I have observed that there is a rather large error between the
> actual voltage and the voltage level displayed by sensors(1) (~ .12V).
>
> Please find attached a small patch that fixes this problem. The data
> sheet is very ambiguous and I and another engineer made the same mistake
> calculating the voltage per DAC step the first time we read the spec sheet.
>
> The confusion stems from an entry in the "maximum voltage" column that
> is higher than the value in the "absolute maximum range" column. For 5V
> only, the value in the "register reading at maximum voltage" is for the
> voltage in the "absolute maximum range", NOT the "maximum voltage". Whew!
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk@2924 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
> [...] I've also included a simple patch to lm93.c to
> increase the wait between retries if there is a timeout.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk@2835 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
is needed to properly lock chip drivers in memory while anyone uses their
/proc entries. This also brings back compatibility with the 2.4 Linux
kernel.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk@2784 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
> Building (the real) 2.8.8 on RH7.3 uncovered a small C99-ism, patch
> against CVS is attached.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk@2746 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
* read dynamic VCCP error status for IN7 & IN8 (if we're in that mode)
* unmask #VRDHOT and dynamic VCCP (if we're in that mode) error events
* move 'start monitoring' command to the end of the inits
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk@2734 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
* VIDs were reading 10x too big - fixed integer magnitude
* enabling smart tach for one fan sometimes disabled it for others -
fixed bit-twiddling during writes
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk@2689 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
revision should be functionally equivalent with the previous, except one small
bugfix: a typo in one of the smart tach SYSCTL numbers. The unified diff from
this revision to the previous is nearly useless - sorry, it can't be helped.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk@2672 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
* reading #VRDHOT inputs
* reading GPIO pins (input only for now)
* reading alarms status
* #PROCHOT override control
* #PROCHOT sampling interval control
* Manual PWM output control
* PWM output frequency control
Also, some whitespace cleanup in the driver.
git-svn-id: http://lm-sensors.org/svn/lm-sensors/trunk@2660 7894878c-1315-0410-8ee3-d5d059ff63e0
Mark M. Hoffman